🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending state troops in the Oregon city, after a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Reconsider Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a previous decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities assert that local officers have command of the circumstances.

In defiance of descriptions of the city as a conflict zone, residents have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an protest bicycle event against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under review simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the military into US cities without cause. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”